Single-cell mapping of gene expression landscapes and lineage in the zebrafish embryo
估计阅读时长: 7 分钟

Assembles a manifold that is defined through a series of overlapping, locally-defined PCA subspaces.

  1. Non-mutual k-nearest-neighborhoods are first obtained for each cell in timepoint i. Neighbor edges are queried from timepoints i (within-timepoint edges) and i-1 (link edges) after projecting into a PCA subspace defined by all cells from timepoint i.
  2. Outgoing edges are then subject to local and global neighborhood restictions.
  3. The graph is restricted to mutual edges.

Fig. 2. Single-cell graph reveals a continuous developmental landscape of cell states. (A) Overview of graph construction strategy, and a force-directed layout of the resulting single-cell graph (nodes colored by collection timepoint). For each cell, up to 20 within- or between-timepoint mutual nearest neighbor edges are retained. (B) Single-cell graph, colored by germ layer identities inferred from differentially expressed marker genes (see table S2). (C) Single-cell graphs, colored by log10 expression counts for indicated cell type-specific marker genes.

A single-cell graph of cell state progression in the developing zebrafish embryo

We sought to map trajectories of cell state during develop-ment by linking cell states across time. Several computational approaches exist to infer orderings of asynchronous pro-cesses from scRNA-seq data (9–11), typically by projecting all cells into a single low-dimensional latent space. Such strategies may be illsuited to map gene expression in developing embryos, which exhibit dramatically increasing cell state di-mensionality and continuous changes in the sets and num-bers of cell state-defining genes (fig. S2, D and E).

To overcome these obstacles, we developed a graph-based strategy for locally embedding consecutive timepoints on the basis of biological variation that they share, rather than using a global coordinate system for all timepoints.

  1. This approach first constructs a single-cell k-nearest-neighbor graph for each timepoint ti, with nodes representing cells and edges linking neighbors in a low-dimensional subspace;
  2. it then joins the graphs by identifying neighboring cells in pairs of adjacent time points, using a coordinate system learned from the future (ti+1) timepoint (see methods).
  3. The resulting graph spans all time points, and allows application of formal graph-based methods for data analysis.

Single-cell mapping of gene expression landscapes and lineage in the zebrafish embryo. Wagner DE, Weinreb C, Collins ZM, Briggs JA, Megason SG, Klein AM. Science 26 Apr 2018. doi:10.1126/science.aar4362

谢桂纲

Attachments

Sort by:DefaultDateName

One response

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

博客文章
November 2026
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930  
  1. 代谢组学那堆名词我上次查资料时也手抄过一页,QC 样本、保留时间、m/z 这些混在一张表里,来回对照着看特别费劲。你这篇把英文缩写和中文解释排在一起,省了我不少翻文献的功夫,尤其是代谢物鉴定那几段。

  2. 文中提出的"能否基于单细胞数据分析方法来分析和可视化我的基因组功能嵌入的结果矩阵呢?"让我想到一个需要先厘清的问题:把Family层级的分类当作细胞分群标签时,功能相似性与亲缘关系可能会混在一起,图上的聚集未必能直接解释为代谢功能接近。如果借用单细胞分析中的降维流程,是否可以同时标注物种分类和基因组注释完整度,看看分离主要对应哪一种差异?尤其是这里用的是EC注释的TF-IDF矩阵,缺少某项注释究竟代表功能缺失还是未被识别,也可能影响对分群结果的判断。

  3. Greetings! I stumbled upon this really useful site and figured I'd thanks for you post at here.